Your reputation is calculated from accuracy, evidence quality, and consistency. Only claims are scored — intel signals are a monitoring layer, not a scoring input. This is proof of observable reputation: math-backed credibility from outcomes, not opinions.
0-1000, starts at 100
Weighted calculation of accuracy, evidence quality, and activity. Recalculated after each resolution or contest outcome.
Uncapped, never decreases
Total experience earned through locking claims, resolving, being correct, and maintaining streaks. Unlocks milestones and rewards.
Your Reputation Score is recalculated after every resolution or contest outcome. It's a weighted combination of three factors:
Formula: (Correct resolutions / Total resolved) × 500
Your win rate determines half your score. Incorrect resolutions and overruled contests count as incorrect.
Formula: (Average evidence score across resolutions) × 3
For incorrect resolutions, evidence score reflects quality of error acknowledgment (higher if you provide strong proof of the mistake).
Formula: 4 points per resolved claim, capped at 50 resolutions
Rewards consistent engagement. Reaches maximum at 50 resolved claims.
User has resolved 15 claims: 12 correct, 3 incorrect
Average evidence grade: B (75 points)
XP is uncapped and never decreases. It rewards all activity and unlocks milestones as you progress.
| Action | XP Earned |
|---|---|
| Lock claim (base) | +10 |
| Lock with Grade A evidence | +30 (10+20) |
| Lock with Grade B evidence | +25 (10+15) |
| Lock with Grade C evidence | +20 (10+10) |
| Lock with Grade D evidence | +10 (10+0) |
| Resolve claim (base) | +50 |
| Correct resolution bonus | +100 |
| High-risk claim bonus | +40 |
| Consecutive correct streak | +10 per streak |
Maximum XP per claim: 200 XP (Lock +30 + Resolve +50 + Correct +100 + High-risk +40)
Official documents, court records, verified on-chain transactions
Multiple credible sources, reputable news outlets
Screenshots, single credible source, social media posts
Personal opinion, unverified claims, weak sources
Community members can dispute resolutions they believe are incorrect. Contested outcomes are decided by community vote.
User resolves incorrectly but provides Grade A evidence acknowledging the error
Track record: 8 correct, 2 incorrect out of 10 resolutions
Strong evidence quality helps maintain high reputation despite incorrect outcome.